comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy with and without prophylactic surfactant in preterm neonates

Authors

mahmoud imani department of pediatrics, school of medicine, zahedan university of medical sciences, zahedan, iran

raheleh derafshi department of pediatrics, school of medicine, zahedan university of medical sciences, zahedan, iran

manijeh khalili department of nursing, school of nursing and midwifery, zahedan university of medical sciences, zahedan, iran

arbabisarjou azizollah department of pediatrics, school of medicine, zahedan university of medical sciences, zahedan, iran

abstract

background: preterm labor is at risk for respiratory distress syndrome (rds) and sometimes requires to mechanical ventilation (mv) and surfactant therapy. continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (ncpap) are the methods of respiratory support especially for using in rds of neonates. in other method surfactant is administered to babies via tracheal instillation. the aim of study was comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure (ncpap) with and without prophylactic surfactant therapy in preterm neonates’ rds.  patients and methods:  this is a randomized clinical trial study that performed on eighty newborns (28-34 weeks) who were born in ali-ebne-abitaleb hospital of zahedan university of medical sciences from october 2008 to september 2010. subjects were randomly classified in two groups whom received nasal cpap alone or with surfactant (40 patients in each group).the including criteria for entrance to research were  approved suggested rds, gestational age less than 34 weeks and neonates 72 hours after delivery . the data collected through direct observation and questionnaire contained fourteen items. groups received either surfactant (curosurf, parma, italy) with ncpap or ncpap alone. the data analyzed were conducted through spss 17.00 version and followed by crosstab (pearson chi-square). results: results revealed that six neonates who received only ncpap   and four patients who received ncapa plus surfactant required to machanical ventilation (mv) therapy. after a week, 33 neonates who received only ncpap and 36 patients who received cpap plus prophylactic surfactant remained alive. there was no significant difference between the groups regarding adverse outcomes (p=0.518). conclusions: according to the results of this study, ncpap is affordable as a safe protocol for rds in preterm neonates. further research especially with control or placebo groups is required to clarify and validate our findings.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Comparison of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy with and without Prophylactic Surfactant in Preterm Neonates

Background: Preterm labor is at risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and sometimes requires to mechanical ventilation (MV) and surfactant therapy. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Nasal Continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) are the methods of respiratory support especially for using in RDS of neonates. In other method surfactant is administered to babies via tracheal...

full text

The Efficacy of a Protocolized Nursing Care on Nasal Skin Breakdown in Preterm Neonates Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Background: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is an effective method of ventilation in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Using an appropriate nasal skin care protocol is identical to prevention or reduction of nasal skin breakdown in those who receive NCPAP. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an evidence-based clinical care protocol on nasal sk...

full text

Effectiveness of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration

Background Non-invasive ventilation is increased used in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). Materials and Methods In this clinical trial, eighty ...

full text

Comparison of the Heated Humidified High-flow Nasal Cannula with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as Primary Respiratory Support for Preterm Neonates: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is gaining popularity in the management of respiratory distress in preterm neonates. However, it is not known whether it takes precedence over the gold standard nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in this age group as a primary mode of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). There is limited evidence ...

full text

Sudden Complete Versus Gradual Weaning from Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used as respiratory support in preterm neonates; however, the best weaning method has not yet been determined. In this study, we compared sudden complete and gradual weaning from nasal CPAP (NCPAP) in preterm newborns. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 62 prete...

full text

Prophylactic nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), also known as chronic lung disease (CLD), is the most common serious morbidity associated with premature birth, particularly among those infants who have respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and receive mechanical ventilation after birth. BPD is characterized by lung inflammation and scarring, which are thought to be the effects of excessive (or inadequate) vent...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
iranian journal of neonatology

جلد ۴، شماره ۳، صفحات ۲۶-۳۴

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023